Dated Draft: https://www.w3.org/TR/2020/CR-css-display-3-20200519/
Editor's Draft: http://drafts.csswg.org/css-display-3/
The following color coding convention is used for comments:
Open issues are marked like this
An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope,
Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted.
Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.
Issue 1. # Summary: Ruby vs “formatting context” From: Myles Maxfield Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5047 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5047#issuecomment-626093104 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5047#issuecomment-769634665 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/76b18974bf52eb446219b4a1b09566cd06c95400 Closed: Accepted / OutOfScope Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5047#event-4267935267 Resolved: Editorial
Issue 2. # Summary: typo From: beantaxi Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5078 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5078#issuecomment-633441736 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 3. # Summary: Confusion over “formatting context” From: vwkd Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5105 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5105#issuecomment-893876965 Closed: Rejected Resolved: Editorial
Issue 4. # Summary: Duplicate export of “inline formatting context” From: Anne van Kesteren Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5209 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5209#issuecomment-643904973 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/1f2c366ef4372bdda8b2ff44ef5db893d608c785 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 5. # Summary: Adding display:math|inline-math From: Brian Kardell Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5385 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5385#issuecomment-690462275 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5385#issuecomment-694369213 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5385#issuecomment-745563829 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5385#issuecomment-819641982 Closed: OutOfScope (refiled against MathML Core) Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2020Sep/0007.html ∈ Resolved: https://www.w3.org/2020/09/17-css-minutes#item04 Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2021Apr/0002.html ∈
Issue 6. # Summary: Should <display-legacy> values be aliased at parse time? From: Oriol Brufau Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5575 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5575#issuecomment-893899115 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/48ba2b32840196e1a869f9992c3db6a82f0c2d39 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2021Aug/0017.html ∈
Issue 7. # Summary: order property only mentions “flex items” From: Julian Descottes Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5865 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5865#issuecomment-884323316 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5865#issuecomment-884524335 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5865#issuecomment-885235341 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/0259f1f7df9fc4649501c3a4735261418e667a3a Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2021Jul/0011.html ∈
Issue 8. # Summary: Replaced ruby annotation containers and base containers nonsensical From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6000 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6000#issuecomment-826081277 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6000#issuecomment-826461265 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/2297b7b60a7bf76bf1a2b40ac9a0012fa210b7be Closed: Accepted Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6000#issuecomment-826461265 (thumbs up) Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2021Apr/0006.html ∈
Issue 9. # Summary: visibility:visible inside visibility:hidden a11y problems From: JAWS-test Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6123 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6123#issuecomment-897938789 Closed: Accepted Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6123#issuecomment-893890561 (thumbs up) Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2021Aug/0004.html ∈
Issue 10. # Summary: subgrids don't establish a new grid formatting context From: Oriol Brufau Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6157 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6157#issuecomment-810464691 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/c14215da0e673b0f47faea2e9d37c965058c6f83 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 11. # Summary: Make explicit that inlinification/blockification affects computed value From: Florian Rivoal Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6251 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/086abc058d3a3f6f7f6730d2af827bd555a58279 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 12. # Summary: Why is 'display' not animatable? From: Lea Verou Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6429 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6429#issuecomment-875717214 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6429#issuecomment-877890546 Closed: Rejected Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6429#issuecomment-875730258
Issue 13. # Summary: Remove redundant 'flow' keyword From: Mats Palmgren Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3998 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3998#issuecomment-498667303 Closed: Rejected Note: Commenter is Mozilla implementer, and Mozilla is shipping the keyword. Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2021Aug/0017.html ∈
Issue 14. # Summary: Add 'display: contents list-item'? From: Mats Palmgren Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4022 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4022#issuecomment-893887886 Closed: Rejected Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2021Aug/0017.html ∈
Issue 15. # Summary: Clarify how the root element is laid out From: Nicholas Stimpson From: Andy Jakubowski From: rosshjb Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6480 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7207 Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6708 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/8095 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Telecon 2022-12-07
Issue 16. # Summary: “root element” is undefined From: Chris Rebert Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7786 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/8095 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Telecon 2022-12-07
Issue 17. # Summary: Clarify 'display: contents' on pseudo-elements From: Tim Nguyen Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6518 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6518#issuecomment-898867258 Closed: Retracted
Issue 18. # Summary: Can <br> / <wbr> elements be blockified? From: Ian Kilpatrick Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7049 Open
Issue 19. # Summary: What does “text run” mean? From: Letocha Torgue Philippe Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7768 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7768#issuecomment-1468783428 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7768#issuecomment-1347561901
Issue 20. # Summary: Add 'display: flow' to Short Display table From: Leonardo Cuoto Chueri Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7843 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7843#issuecomment-1270730042 Closed: Rejected Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7843#issuecomment-1319331821
Issue 21. # Summary: Add "flow container" as a synonym for "block container" From: Leonardo Cuoto Chueri Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7844 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7844#issuecomment-1319327867 Closed: Rejected Resolved: Editorial
Issue 22. # Summary: Can the root float? From: fantasai Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8196 Open: =WG= Discuss.