Last call document: http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-css3-images-20120112/
Editor's draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-images/
The following color coding convention is used for comments:
An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope,
Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted.
Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.
Issue 1. Summary: Use linear RGB for gradients From: Witold Baryluk Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jan/0607.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jan/0617.html Closed: Rejected Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jan/0635.html
Issue 2.
Summary: Don't use prepositions in linear-gradient()
From: Robert Biggs
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jan/0720.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jan/0783.html
Comment: (private mail - accepted resolution for radial-gradient, but
didn't accept it for linear-gradient)
Note: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Aug/0271.html
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0384.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0387.html
Closed: Rejected
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0549.html
Issue 3. Summary: Use of 'bounding box' is undefined, should be 'border box' From: Leif Arne Storset Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0033.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1386.html Closed: Accepted+Deferred Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1399.html Deferred: The element() feature has been deferred to Level 4.
Issue 4. Summary: 'element reference identifier' underdefined From: David Baron Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0253.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0265.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1398.html Closed: Accepted+Deferred Deferred: The element() feature has been deferred to Level 4.
Issue 5.
Summary: The element() cycle detection algo phrasing implies an incremental
algorithm.
From: David Baron
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0251.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0269.html
Closed: Accepted+Deferred
Deferred: The element() feature has been deferred to Level 4.
Issue 6.
Summary: The element() cycle detection algo misses cycles caused by
host-language elements.
From: David Baron
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0254.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0270.html
Closed: Accepted+Deferred
Deferred: The element() feature has been deferred to Level 4.
Issue 7.
Summary: The term "paint sources" is insufficiently defined, and should
have explicit definitions for HTML and SVG.
From: David Baron
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0252.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0264.html
Closed: Accepted+Deferred
Deferred: The element() feature has been deferred to Level 4.
Issue 8.
Summary: HTML's definition of "paint source" only exists in the WHATWG
version of HTML5, so it should be directly linked to.
From: Leif Arne Storset
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0267.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0271.html
Closed: Accepted+Deferred
Deferred: The element() feature has been deferred to Level 4.
Issue 9. Summary: 'image-orientation' should be applied before any other transformations From: 呂康豪 (Kang-Hao Lu) Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0404.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0517.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 10.
Summary: Concrete Object Size resolution algorithm has clumsy text,
implying that only one dimension is resolved in one of the steps
From: 呂康豪 (Kang-Hao Lu)
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0395.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0518.html
Closed: Accepted
Issue 11. Summary: element() examples still used old IDENT syntax. From: 呂康豪 (Kang-Hao Lu) Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0394.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0519.html Closed: Accepted+Deferred Deferred: The element() feature has been deferred to Level 4.
Issue 12. Summary: specify element() behavior when the selector matches multiple elements From: 呂康豪 (Kang-Hao Lu) Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0394.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0519.html Closed: Accepted+Deferred Deferred: The element() feature has been deferred to Level 4.
Issue 13. Summary: specify that relative image() urls compute to absolute From: 呂康豪 (Kang-Hao Lu) Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0393.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0696.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 14.
Summary: image() shouldn't require implementations to support Media Fragments
From: 呂康豪 (Kang-Hao Lu)
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0388.html
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1049.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1102.html
Closed: Partially Accepted - keep requirement, but add a generalized form
of the commenter's idea as well, as suggested by fantasai
Issue 15. Summary: Better define how image-orientation interacts with EXIF data From: Simon Fraser Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0311.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0877.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 16. Summary: Gradients shouldn't transition using premultiplied alpha. From: Rik Cabanier Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1071.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1081.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1090.html Closed: Rejected Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1084.html
Issue 17. Summary: element() function should move to the next level of Images From: Simon Fraser Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0324.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0347.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 18.
Summary: Define 'dpi' and 'dpcm' in terms of the real physical units,
not the CSS units
From: 呂康豪 (Kang-Hao Lu)
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0408.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0430.html
Closed: Rejected
Verified: krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/whatwg/20120222#l-80
Issue 19. Summary: Several typos From: 呂康豪 (Kang-Hao Lu) Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0408.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0430.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 20.
Summary: It's unclear if image-resolution is supposed to apply to images
specified in CSS
From: Simon Fraser
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0323.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0329.html
Closed: Accepted
Issue 21.
Summary: The spec points to Values & Units for a definition of <position>,
but it's not defined there.
From: Lea Verou
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jan/0950.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1106.html
Closed: Rejected
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1107.html
Issue 22. Summary: There should be a non-example reference to CSSElementMap From: Simon Fraser Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0268.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0266.html Closed: Accepted+Deferred Deferred: The element() feature has been deferred to Level 4.
Issue 23.
Summary: Wording of 'object-fit:fill' seems to imply that the content box
*must* be filled
From: Leif Arne Storset
Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0034.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0099.html
Closed: Accepted
Issue 24. Summary: 'object-fit:cover/contain' contain seemingly redundant text From: Leif Arne Storset Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0036.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0098.html Note: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011May/0638.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1122.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0517.html Closed: Accepted Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0525.html
Issue 25. Summary: "Concentric ellipses" is imprecise From: 呂康豪 (Kang-Hao Lu) Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1361.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1375.html Closed: Accepted Verified: XXX NEEDS REVIEW
Issue 26. Summary: specify alignment of varying-size pages for broken element() From: fantasai Closed: Accepted
Issue 27. Summary: Allow image() to accept element() From: TabAtkins Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0265.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1143.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1398.html Closed: Accepted+Deferred Deferred: The element() feature has been deferred to Level 4.
Issue 28. Summary: Use of <svg> as a paint source From: Erik Dahlstrom Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1124.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1131.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1137.html Closed: Rejected+Deferred Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1250.html Deferred: The element() feature has been deferred to Level 4.
Issue 29. Summary: Clarify "not rendered" From: Erik Dahlstrom Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1124.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1137.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1250.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1265.html Closed: Accepted+Deferred Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1330.html Deferred: The element() feature has been deferred to Level 4.
Issue 30. Summary: Style resolution of elements not in document From: Boris Zbarsky Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1256.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1268.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1269.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1278.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1279.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1288.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1350.html Closed: ??? Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1356.html Deferred: The element() feature has been deferred to Level 4.
Issue 31. Summary: Define precisely how SVG paint servers are used as paint sources Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1250.html (bottom) Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1265.html (bottom) Closed: Accepted Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1330.html (bottom) Deferred: The element() feature has been deferred to Level 4.
Issue 32. Summary: objectBoundingBox and userSpaceOnUse are defined to be identical Note: raised against edits resulting from other issues, not against LC From: Dirk Schulze Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1296.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1304.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1305.html Closed: Invalid
Issue 33. Summary: aliasing of object-fit/object-position From: Erik Dahlstrom Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1126.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1127.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0518.html Closed: Accepted Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0526.html
Issue 34. Summary: element() and 3D Transforms From: Dirk Schulze Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1294.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1297.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1325.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1334.html Closed: Deferred to Level 4. Deferred: The element() feature has been deferred to Level 4.
Issue 35. Summary: GCPM element() and Images element() From: fantasai / Håkon Lie Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1430.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1433.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0012.html Closed: Deferred to Level 4 Deferred: The element() feature has been deferred to Level 4.
Issue 36. Summary: Clarify scope of required Media Fragments support for image() From: David Baron Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0152.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0493.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 37. Summary: ltr/rtl annotations should be per image() not per URL From: 呂康豪 (Kang-Hao Lu) Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0243.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0519.html Closed: Deferred to Level 4 Deferred: The directional images feature has been deferred to Level 4.
Issue 38. Summary: Default object size for replaced elements is incorrect From: David Baron Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0336.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0339.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 39. Summary: Concrete object size should link to algorithm From: David Baron Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0337.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0342.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 40. Summary: Editorial comments on linear-gradient() From: David Baron Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0338.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0341.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 41. Summary: Combine directional images into image-orientation From: 呂康豪 (Kang-Hao Lu) Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0397.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0513.html Note: See also Issue 37 Closed: Deferred to Level 4 Deferred: The directional images feature has been deferred to Level 4.
Issue 42. Summary: image-orientation should inherit From: 呂康豪 (Kang-Hao Lu) Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0397.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0513.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 43. Summary: Handling of negative color stops unclear From: David Baron Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0357.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0372.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0378.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0380.html Closed: Accepted Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0393.html
Issue 44. Summary: Clarifications to intrinsic sizing terminology From: David Baron Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0358.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0414.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0496.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 45. Summary: Define closest aspect ratio more precisely From: Øyvind Stenhaug Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0402.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0498.html Closed: Accepted Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0527.html
Issue 46. Summary: Accessibility Review From: Michael Cooper Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0361.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0366.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0368.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 47. Summary: Interaction of object-fit and default sizing algorithm is messy From: David Baron Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0363.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0425.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0577.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 48. Summary: SVG with one intrinsic dimension and an aspect ratio From: David Baron Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0364.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0415.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0496.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 49. Summary: object-fit's resizing behavior doesn't account for mixed min/max constraints From: David Baron Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0369.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0370.html Closed: Invalid via Issue 24 edits
Issue 50. Summary: image-orientation application unclear wrt background / 'content' images From: David Baron Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0388.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0412.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 51. Summary: Capitalization of MAY inconsistent From: David Baron Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0389.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0413.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 52. Summary: Editorial clarification to concrete object size determination From: David Baron Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0365.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0550.html Closed: Accepted
Issue 53. Summary: Remove out-of-document element references feature From: Tab Atkins and fantasai Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0477.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0487.html Closed: Accepted