Dated Draft: https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/CR-css-text-decor-3-20180703/
Editor's Draft: http://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor-3/
The following color coding convention is used for comments:
Open issues are marked like this
An issue can be closed as Accepted
, OutOfScope
,
Invalid
, Rejected
, or Retracted
.
Verified
indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.
Issue 1. # Summary: Are text decorations visual (ink) overflow or layout overflow? From: Myles Maxfield Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3272 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3272#issuecomment-444706836 Changes: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/c9ddc665085ed4c3b5c2e1889b222f4fd7815ab9 Closed: Accepted Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Dec/0007.html ∈
Issue 2. # Summary: Example images have bad spacing From: Nat McCully Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3436 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3436#issuecomment-495805833 Closed: Accepted Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3436#issuecomment-495812441 Resolved: Editorial
Issue 3. # Summary: Emphasis dots should have consistent position around ruby From: Nat McCully Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3437 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3437#issuecomment-446897904 Closed: Rejected Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3437#issuecomment-495818108 Resolved: [see earlier WG discussions]
Issue 4. # Summary: Vertical text "underlines" are outside the EM box From: Nat McCully Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3438 Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3438#issuecomment-495808880 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 5. # Summary: UA style sheet uses invalid text-underline-position From: Xidorn Quan Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3441 Resposne: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3441#issuecomment-494486308 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial
Issue 6. # Summary: Update link to Kenten Generic From: Fuqiao Xue Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/3832 Closed: Accepted Resolved: Editorial